next up previous contents
Next: 2. Castep Performance on Up: castep_performance_xt Previous: Contents   Contents

Subsections

1. Introduction

This Distributed Computational Science and Engineering (dCSE) project is to implement a new parallelisation strategy in the density functional theory program Castep[1], on top of the existing parallelisation if possible, in order to extend the number of nodes that Castep can be run on efficiently. Although benchmarking Castep performance is a part of this dCSE project, it is anticipated that this will allow Castep to run efficiently on O(1000) processing elements (PEs) of the HECToR national supercomputer.

Castep was included as one of the benchmark programs used in the HECToR procurement exercise. Increasing the efficiency of Castep's parallelisation strategies will not only enable HECToR to be used more productively, it will enable considerably larger simulations to be performed and open up many new avenues of research.

1.1 The dCSE Project

This dCSE project commenced 1st December 2007, and is scheduled to end on the 31st July 2008. The Principal Investigator on the grant was Dr K. Refson (RAL). Dr M.I.J. Probert (York) and Dr M. Plummer (STFC) also provided help and support.

At the heart of a Castep calculation is the iterative solution of a large eigenvalue problem to find the lowest 1% or so of the eigenstates, called `bands', and this calculation is currently parallelised over the components of the bands. The aim of this project was to implement an additional level of parallelism by distributing the bands themselves. The project was to be comprised of four phases:

  1. Basic Band Parallelism Split the storage and workload of the dominant parts of a Castep calculation over the `bands', in addition to the current parallelisation scheme.

  2. Distributed Matrix Inversion and Diagonalisation At various points of a Castep calculation large matrices need to be inverted or diagonalised, and this is currently done in serial. In this phase we will distribute this workload over as many processors as possible.

  3. Band-Independent Optimiser The current optimisation of the bands requires frequent, expensive orthonormalisation steps that will even more expensive with the new bands-parallelism. Implementing a different, known optimisation algorithm that does not require such frequent orthonormalisation should improve speed and scaling.

  4. Parallelisation and Optimisation of New Band Optimiser To work on making the new optimiser as fast and robust as possible, and parallelise the new band optimisation algorithm.

The overall aim was to enable Castep to scale efficiently to at least eight times more nodes on HECToR. An additional phase was introduced at the request of NAG, to investigate Castep performance on HECToR in general to determine the best compiler, compiler flags and libraries to use.

1.2 Summary of Progress

All three phases of the project have been completed successfully, based on Castep 4.2 source code, though there remains some scope for optimisation and several possible extensions. Basic Castep calculations can be parallelised over bands in addition to the usual parallelisation schemes, and the large matrix diagonalisation and inversion operations have also been parallelised. Two band-independent optimisation schemes have been implemented and shown to work under certain conditions.

The performance of Castep on HECToR has been improved dramatically by this dCSE project. One example is the standard benchmark al3x3, which now scales effectively to almost four times the number of cores compared to the ordinary Castep 4.2 (see figure 1.1).

Figure 1.1: Graph showing the performance and scaling improvement achieved by this dCSE project (using 8-way band-parallelism) compared to the ordinary Castep 4.2 code for the standard al3x3 benchmark.
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{epsimages/headline.eps}


next up previous contents
Next: 2. Castep Performance on Up: castep_performance_xt Previous: Contents   Contents
Sarfraz A Nadeem 2008-09-03